mate vs xfce

by josealb77 » Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:00 pm, Post Todos somos muy ignorantes. Go here to see the post associated with that video. Teniendo una buena máquina, entre esos 3 que nombraste me quedo con Mate.- With that computer, I don't think performance is going to make any significant difference for either, but I think XFCE is slightly lighter than Mate. by l0ad » Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:49 am, Post Post by nestoriano » Thu Mar 07, 2013 2:34 pm, Post Just out of curiosity, what makes you say MATE is going backward? Esto sig… Is there still a lot of development for Mate? Use XFCE y MATE, pero no me convencieron mucho. LXDE vs. XFCE System Resource Efficiency. Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. Sin embargo es el mejor escritorio que existe hoy por hoy en Linux, altamente configurable y personalizable.- Tanto KDE cómo Cinnamon consumen mas memoria y mas recursos de sistema que Mate o XFCE. The only thing I miss about gnome2 is the system monitor panel applet that showed everything in a graph. Lamedición se ha realizado teniendo en cuenta una situación muyclara. Again, with LXQt vs MATE, the primary different again comes down to Qt vs GTK+. Xfce vs MATE. Linux can be customized to a great extent. LXDE is a minimalistic desktop environment, somewhat like Windows XP in look and feel. I don’t know fully the extent or specifics of all these environments but I have tried all of them. Parece que olvidé poner KDE, lo usé hace mucho tiempo y no era tan estable, no para principiantes, pero: José Manuel cuando dices. I set it up as testing machine and, allbeit a bit slow by today's standard, it's actually totally usable and no way near an annoying experience. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Si eres de los que buscan un entorno de escritorio ligero para tu sistema Linux, tal vez te sientas un poco abrumado al buscar por internet. Mate: Es gnome2 estable de toda la vida, escritorio que he usado por mas tiempo. El propósito de esta comparativa es ayudar a los principiantes a decidir qué escritorio usar, teniendo en cuenta requisitos de hardware, aspecto visual, características generales y facilidad de uso. Also, it follows a slower development schedule compared to Cinnamon. A few years ago I would have suggested Xfce over Mate for speed but ever since Xfce 4.12 came out I rescind that. So I am thinking about installing Linux mint Debian for my laptop and am unsure if I want to try Mate or use xfce. Todos ellos son completos, aunque no igual de personalizables. It is a very bare-bone, minimalist desktop environment. However, MATE is also less customizable than Xfce. In addition, Xfce still shows signs of its more geeky past. Cómo completo y funcional, también les diria que Mate es mas completo y funcional que los otros dos. Todays Linux Mint distributed under the 32 bit and 64 bit version with different desktop environment version such as Cinnamon, Mate, KDE, and XFCE. Hace unos años hice una hoja de cálculo … Linux Mint Cinnamon Vs. MATE: The Visual Differences I'm using MATE on my laptop at the moment. See which works best for you. Mi voto va para xfce. Out of the box, MATE has more features than Xfce, but it is more difficult to configure. It is designed to run on legacy hardware which requires a desktop environment that has minimal system requirements. How can you discover all features/pitfalls in just a few days? canela vs mate vs kde vs xfce. I might have to look into that. Laptop specs: amd A6 1.5ghz quad core 4gb ddr3 1066mhz 500gb hd 1366x768 display, Linux based operating systems I have used: Arch linux mint 12 lxde & 13 with cinnamon and xfce Ubuntu 11.10 & 12.04 Fedora 17 gnome 3 Opensuse 12.1 Backtrack 5. Xfce is a lightweight 2D desktop environment designed for better performance on older hardware. Ya sea que estén usando una computadora vieja y lenta y que solo necesiten sacar el máximo provecho de ella, o si estén usando un sistema nuevo de alto rendimiento y quieran dedicar todo ese poder a la tarea en cuestión Mantener todo lo más delgado posible es la clave. Estaba tratando de encontrar un entorno de escritorio que se parezca y actúe de manera muy similar a Windows. Pero no todos ignoramos las mismas cosas. Igual cada quien usa lo que mejor le parece y se adapte a sus necesidades, y las mías las llena de sobra KDE como entorno de escritorio. It's not necessarily bad, but some people prefer the other approach. It reminds me very much of Linux distros of years past. Like Mate, Xfce is primarily for older hardware which many have issues with the demands of Cinnamon. Install everything and each alternative window manager for a day. ram. by juansantiago » Thu Mar 07, 2013 4:24 pm, Post cinnamon vs mate vs kde vs xfce. Also, how can you say that XFCE is more current when they used the same GTk version for development? by The Dark Side » Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:52 pm, Post I'm a little partial to MATE, being an Ubuntu user since Hoary. by hatteras » Wed Mar 06, 2013 4:37 pm, Post XFCE is moving forward, while MATE is going backward. En primerlugar, y antes de entrar al ranking dedistribuciones Linux debajo consumo como tal, hay quedecir que todas ellas consumen menos de 1 GB dememoria RAM. Long story short: Between MATE and Xfce, I'd choose Xfce. Mate is based on Gnome, so it's not going to be nearly as light as xfce. by nestoriano » Thu Mar 07, 2013 3:13 pm, Post Antes de usarlo no tenía claro cuál era mi escritorio preferido, ahora no tengo ninguna duda. GNOME, Unity, KDE, MATE DE’s are suitable for the users who are using Linux for everyday tasks such as web-browsing, listening to music, watching videos, etc. I've had only two issues: Bluetooth integration doesn't work (this is a known problem), and panel sometimes doesn't autohide (it happened in GNOME 2 as well). Cinnamon, el escritorio por … The Best Lean Linux Desktop Environment: LXDE vs. Xfce vs. MATE Tweaking your choice of Linux desktop environment can speed things up a lot. XFCE feels much better than Mate, IMO. Beberapa tahun yang lalu saya membuat spreadsheet yang membandingkan fitur-fitur lingkungan desktop. MATE comes with more features than Xfce. It is worth noting that MATE misses some of the newer features that are available in Cinnamon. canela vs mate vs kde vs xfce. by josealb77 » Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:22 pm, Post by rebhecca » Sat Jun 08, 2019 2:19 pm, Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited. The kernel will be updated as you get updates from your distro's repo, or if you choose to update the kernel manually. Best thing is to install both, and try them out. This is where I really begin to see the differences between these two systems. A review of MATE, Xfce, LXDE, LXQt, Budgie, Lumina, and Moksha. Openbox serves as a very different function than XFCE or MATE. Mate is better sorted. The project only added user-friendliness as its goal around 2006. Las opciones propuestas son muchas, pero válidas para un recién llegado a linux son pocas. Se puede adaptar el repositorio a cambio de perder estabilidad por meter cosas que no fueron hechos para el. I'm not sure if Mate was still a bit buggy compared to gnome 2 when I last tried it (pretty recently), or if I've just grown to like XFCE a whole lot more than I used to. Xfce: Ve výchozím nastavení používá gtk, tradiční rozvržení, ale velmi přizpůsobitelné, velmi lehké. Pero KDE realmente es hermoso, por donde se lo mire.-. This will probably be a fairly short post, because most of the detail is in the video. En honor a la verdad xfce y MATE/Gnome 2 son muy parecidos, ambos se basan en GTK y comparten grna número de programas, de hecho es realmente fácil hacer que un escritorio xfce sea identico a un escritorio a un escritorio MATE. GNOME2/MATE look more polished than XFCE in my opinion. It runs and looks great. Teniendo una buena máquina, entre esos 3 que nombraste me quedo con Mate.-. Selecting among these two is very difficult. The kernel has nothing to do with the desktop environment you use. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. It blows my mind that a 7 year old laptop runs this great with the most up to date software. El mejor entorno de escritorio Lean Linux LXDE Vs Xfce Vs MATE Para algunos usuarios de Linux, el rendimiento es el rey. It runs a a webserver and I even use gimp on it as well for a bit of casual image editing. Linux Mint Cinnamon vs MATE vs XFCE vs KDE Enfrentamos a los cuatros escritorios que se ofrecen por defecto en Linux Mint: KDE, MATE, XFCE, y Cinnamon. Even a few years after that, Xfce hadn't completed the simple, user-friendly task of adding a desktop launcher. Default Desktop Environment KDE, GNOME and XFCE (more with Community Editions) Init-System systemd. It is easy to switch back and forth. by rop75 » Thu Mar 07, 2013 7:15 pm, Post All things Linux and GNU/Linux -- this is neither a community exclusively about the kernel Linux, nor is exclusively about the GNU operating system. This is … Xfce my friend, I was forced to switch desktop environment because of Unity, which in my particular case, I don't like. 0 Bugs ni problemas de ningún tipo, ni bajo rendimiento y además es muy completo y funcional: nunca he echado de menos ninguna función, cosa que sí me ha pasado en LXDME, XFCE, Gnome, Cinnamon, etc. Here we look at three options: LXQt, Xfce, and MATE. I believe there's an xfce applet to use old gnome panel applets, although I'm not sure if it's still maintained. What I want to know is: Is there still a lot of development for Mate? I would say XFCE is the better choice. Also try KDE and the gnome-shell. I want to open LibreOffice in 1 freakin' second (I'm in Lubuntu 20.04 right now and … What kind of apps do you prefer? When I say 'Xfce,' it’s a good bet you think about a lean, responsive Linux desktop environment that’s particularly light on system memory usage. MATE is not Lightweight Desktop. Like Mate, Xfce generally lives up to its self-description. La interfaz gráfica se llama Cinnamon ( canela en inglés ), no Sinnamon. Before continuing with the comparison between the XFCE, the GNOME 3 and the KDE, it should be clear for experts that we can’t touch the MATE desktop as an option in the comparison. Currently, I am using MATE. Linux Mint 20: Cinnamon VS Mate VS XFCE : Which one is SNAPPIER? Also can the kernel be updated in the same way it could in linux mint and ubuntu? It offers a desktop environment for every user. Out of the box, MATE has a few more bells and whistles than Xfce, but it's also a little less customizable. In this post, MiniTool Partition Wizard introduces 7 popular Linux desktop environments and shows their pros and cons. I run a six-core desktop with a lot of video power and RAM just because the environment stays out of the way of other programs when it needs to. Hi everyone, This post is about Linux Mint MATE and XFCE, specifically about which is faster and uses less RAM. Some people don't know the differences between various Linux desktop environments and they may ask questions like Cinnamon vs MATE vs XFCE. This is done on request by someone who watched my Linux Mint 19 MATE Review video from three months ago. It is a desktop environment best suited for those looking for a traditional, seamlessly working desktop. by juansantiago » Thu Mar 07, 2013 2:50 pm, Post Prefiero el Linux Mint en su versión, mate. Es la llamada de “uso real”, es decir, con el ordenador iniciado y Firefox, la terminal y el gestorde archivos funcionando.En teoría, estos tres programasdeberían consumir lo mismo siempre. Prefiero MATE. Last night I took a 7 year old HP laptop and put Arch on it with XFCE as my desktop environment after having installed a similar setup in a virtual box last week. It is fast, easy, and simple. I run xfce/xubuntu on a 2004 laptop, 1.3mhz with 500Mb (!) MATE: Blízko Xfce, je to moderní reinkarnace GNOME 2 poté, co se GNOME přesunul do úplně jiného GNOME 3. Choose Linux Mint Mate or Cinnamon or XFCE or KDE ? Xfce vs. MATE. However, when it comes to comparisons MATE and Xfce, you can go mad. Fedora 24: Comparing Gnome, KDE Plasma, Cinnamon, MATE, Xfce, LXDE. Mate > Me quedo con XFCE, más liviano, no está mal pero sería bueno que unieran fuerzas con XFCE. With the final release of Fedora 24 arriving on Tuesday, I've installed each of the six desktops on a different laptop or netbook. Out of the box XFCE is pretty bare but there are all kinds of themes that you can install, it is very customizable. XFCE vs LXDE - Cuál es mejor para mí. MATE. Mate vs XFCE. Xfce vs. MATE. Official Supported Architectures x86-64 (AMD64) More lightweight also means "has fewer functions", which means you have to "explicitly" install lots of stuff. It’s up to you to decide which one you would like to prefer. What about when I … So I am thinking about installing Linux mint Debian for my laptop and am unsure if I want to try Mate or use xfce. When you need to install the Linux Mint which one you should choose? Mate es muy maduro, muy estable, en cuanto a consumo de recursos está parejo con Xfce (creo que Xfce consume menos recursos, aunque por poco margen). Respuesta 1: Yo era un usuario de Windows. XFCE, LXQT don’t offer fancy animations and icons but they’re popular among developers. Para ello, prefiero MATE, tan estable como Gnome 2. A este grupo pertenecen Mate, XFCE, Cinnamon y LXDE. Cinammon: Používá gtk, tradiční rozvržení, používá 3D efekty mnohem více než Xfce a MATE. Ahora, si tu máquina ya tiene algunos años o es muy vieja ni se te ocurra meterle KDE porque te va a andar como una tortuga. GNOME 2 was the thing to use at the time - clean, sleek and cool. He probado Mint con Mate y con Xface, respecto a Mete ninguna duda, me gusta definirlo así: tiene algunas cosas superfluas que te facilitan la vida y es muy estable, también e probado xface en máquinas con pocos recursos y ahora en dos núcleos dos gigas ram. Mate es muy maduro, muy estable, en cuanto a consumo de recursos está parejo con Xfce (creo que Xfce consume menos recursos, aunque por poco margen). La comparativa se ha realizado en un netbook, el Samsung NC10, en el cual han ejecutado ese entorno de pruebas en las últimas versiones de los cuatro entornos de escritorio/gestores de ventanas más populares en la actualidad: GNOME 2.29.1, KDE SC 4.4.1, LXDE 0.5 y XFCE 4.6.1. Gnome 3 > Safa, pero es muy “mobile” a lo WIndows 8, no es de mi agrado para uso personal, con el tiempo fue madurando y mejoraron el consumo de recursos, si … If you prefer Qt software and you want a lighter desktop, then LXQt is a no-brainer. by juansantiago » Wed Mar 06, 2013 4:27 pm, Post KDE consume bastante memoria y recursos de sistema, pero si tenés una máquina medianamente actual, lo va a correr bien. Jawaban 1: Saya adalah pengguna windows. Main Usage Desktop which recent packages that are slightly longer tested than in Arch. Xfce makes use of lesser resources, but its benefits come to light when you will be download and run the apps which depend on GNOME. Mate feels like Gnome 2 feels: old. Tampoco hay que negar que hay aplicaciones para Gnome muy buenas, en mi caso prefiero usar las aplicaciones multimedia de Gnome que las KDE. A fork of GNOME 2, MATE had its latest stable release 1.22 on March 18th, 2019 (as of October 2019). Xfce uses less resources, but this advantage begins to break down as you install and run apps that depend on GNOME libraries. I would have to say that you should go with XFCE as well. En ubuntu hay PPA para todo, en debian eso no existe. In a fresh boot, CPU usage is the same at around 1 percent, but LXDE uses a paltry 219 MB RAM, whereas XFCE uses 465 MB RAM. Go for XFCE, or LXDE, which is even more lightweight. First things first, these are all desktop environments that you can download on whatever distro you are using. Laptop specs: amd A6 1.5ghz quad … The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. Xfce desktop is very light and customizable, so I expect that you will fit well to it. However, it does NOT come with several key packages built-in that I think many new users would expect. by The Dark Side » Thu Mar 07, 2013 4:07 pm, Post Saya mencoba menemukan Lingkungan Desktop yang terlihat dan bertindak seperti windows. They've bloated it (I use barely more RAM in KDE than XFce 4.12 needs and it's as fast as Xfce), they haven't added any real functionality, and it's still buggy. Estimado juansantiago: Sí, el problema que siempre tuvo KDE es que necesita una máquina medianamente potente para desplegar todo su potencial. Lo recomiendo, es estable, completo y sencillo. Estimados: Si los vamos a medir en terminos de estabilidad, sin lugar a dudas que Mate es, sin lugar a dudas el mas estable de estos 3 escritorios que mencionan. It knows what fullscreen is, how to handle more than one monitor, and also uses less resources than the other gnome-ish DE's. Is it customization? What I want to know is: Is it lightweight? Cómo completo y funcional, también les diria que Mate es mas completo y funcional que los otros dos. However, MATE is faster than Cinnamon, consumes fewer resources, and is more stable, which adds to its popularity.

Philadelphia Guava Cheesecake, Stinging Nettle Poisonous Look Alikes, Anesthesia Critical Care Fellowship Application, Wildwood Guitars Review, Social Factors Affecting Consumer Behaviour,